A Sign from Allaah
Quraanic Scripture; surah 18, ayat 18:
"and thou mightest think them awake while they were asleep, and We turned them about to the right and to the left, with their dog out-stretching its paws at the entrance. If thou didst look at them, thou wouldst turn back from them in flight, and thou wouldst be filled with awe because of them"
Recent internal chinese politically conflict details rotational planetary direction, in thought and action, as present history continually begins to realign with structured antiquity or as written in the biblical scripture, ' the ancient of days'. The understanding of prophecy is the wisdom obtained from its fulfillment. The strength of prophet muhammad's belief of the reality of Allaah, and his societal postioning as a foundation on the planet was the scripture of Black people:
Quraanic scripture; surah 25, ayat 5-6
وقالوا اساطير الاولين اكتتبها فهى تملى عليه بكرة واصيلا .5
فل انزله الذى يعلم السرفى السموت و الارض انه كان غفورا رحيم .6
5. And they say: stories of the ancients, which he has got written, so they are read out to him every morning and evening!
6. Say: He has revealed it, Who knows the secret of the heavens and the earth. Surely He is ever forgiving, merciful.
Also understanding that the kaba or spiritual center of the muslims (Black people), located in arabia (Black country) is referred to in the quraanic scripture as the 'ancient house'.
Quraanic scripture: surah 22 ayat 32-33
ذلك و من يعظم شعا ئر الله فا نها من تقوى القلوب .32
33. لكم فيها منا فع الى اجل مسمى ثم محلها الى البيت العتيق
32. That (shall be so). And whoever respects the ordinances of Allaah, this is surely from the piety of the hearts.
33. Therein are benefits for you for a term appointed, then their place of sacrifice (animal) is the Acient House.
The usual root of internal conflict within Black power structures on the planet, dating back 6000 years is the devil; caucasian people. Planetary history describes the war of the chinese people with the european devil as the opium wars; devils doing business with brain washed chinese people, exchanging drugs for the natural resources of the chinese country. The political protocol from the chinese fighting the european devil produced a leasing document to europe where hong kong, the surrounding islands, and certain short range territories from the islands were leased to europe for 99 years. From the 99 year lease agreement, came a re-meeting of europe and china in 1984, producing the sino-british joint declaration basically declaring that the bristish control of certain chinese areas was over; that the time of the lease agreement was up. This included hong kong. Let us understand. Within the far east asia continent of 100s of millions of chinese people, europe was ruling/ controlling hong kong, and certain surrounding areas. The affect of planetary evolution on the human being that includes grevious conflicting visceral growth, and development is the experimental result that we see today of china and hong kong, and the chaotic confusion between those people. How are they not the same people, if they are within the same area? The official end of the 99 years lease was 1997, with europe transferring total power of their chinese controlled areas to the country of china. Again, this included hong kong. The official declaration rule of the chinese government is communism, but european controlled chinese areas were under democratic rule, thus creating the present day conflict that we now see germanating within a power structure that wants to solidfy as a foundation structure.
bamboozled - illusionary human being perception from devil deceit, with a greater than magnitude affect, controlling conscious/subconscious human being social activity
the following is a partial reprint from an unknown chinese source:
' . . . . This is a question left over from the past. The region of Hong Kong (comprising Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories) has been part of China's territory since ancient times. In 1840 Britain launched the Opium War against China, and in 1842 it forced the Qing government to sign the Treaty of Nanjing, according to which Hong Kong Island was permanently ceded to Britain. In 1856 the Anglo-French forces launched the second Opium War, and in 1860 Britain forced the Qing government to conclude the Convention of Beijing, under which the tip of the Kowloon Peninsula was likewise permanently ceded to Britain. Taking advantage of moves by other powers to stake out spheres of influence in China, in 1898 Britain once again forced the Qing government to sign a treaty, the Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong. Under this convention Britain was granted a 99-year lease on a large stretch of land on the Kowloon Peninsula and more than 200 surrounding isles (referred to as the "New Territories"), a lease that is due to expire on June 30, 1997. The Chinese people have always been opposed to the three unequal treaties. Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, the consistent position of the Chinese government has been that Hong Kong is part of China's territory.'
From an Island: Genesis of the Atlantic Slave Trade
the following are several excerpts from the book: Samba, Isaac Mampuya. Survival and Punishment of the Slave Traffic from Gabon Until the Congo in 1840–1880 (Volume One)
- 'from 1483, the travels of the explorer Câo Diego, opened the doors of the Portuguese Central Africa, through the Kingdom of Kongo. Thus were born Kongo deals households, alongside the colonization of Sao Thome, where, the culture the cane rapidly grew. The first settlers of the island of Sao Thome were deported and converted Jewish children. These new Christians were married to imported slaves the coast of Guinea first, and then the coast of Kongo thereafter. This society of Mestizo would quickly turn into slave trading’s, when the inhabitants of the island of Sao Thome had obtained from the Manikongo the redemption privilege of slaves on the African coast opposite the archipelago. When the Portuguese reached the mouth of Kongo, they were, for the first time in the African continent, in contact with a powerful kingdom and organized, the Kongo (Congo) '
- 'The discovery of Brazil in 1500 resulted from the middle of the XVI century – the introduction of the cultivation of sugar cane, which in turn would cause a massive demand for African labor. After that we had noticed his superiority on the labor provided by Brazilian natives. The Spanish West Indies also began to import slaves to their plantations of sugar cane whereas at their side, the Lusitanian Atlantic islands and the metropolitan Portugal demanded constantly labor. Thus, when Central Africa was open to the influence of Western Europe through the Kongo, coincided with a need for men who would be quickly compensated by the slave traffic . . . . '
- ' . . . . The growing need for labor grew them organize the first, trafficking from Kongo. Since 1500, the King of Portugal granted to these farmers settled in the island of Saô-Thomé, the privilege to buying and selling from the Gulf of Guinea to Kongo. Trampling on the authority of local rulers and using their mobility from the sea by their vessels, Saô – Thomeans would banking directly with the vassals of the “Manikongo”, which did not fail to provoke discord in the kingdom and the independence of some governors, who finally had founded their own little kingdoms. The coast of Congo and Angola provided a large amount of excellent slaves . . . . '
From a Chinese Perspective
the following article first appeared in the global times: https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1163082.shtml
London violates commitment of Sino-British Joint Declaration
Source:Global Times Published: 2019/8/29 20:28:40
For some time now, the British government has been making irresponsible remarks about Hong Kong, claiming that under the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration, Britain still holds responsibility for Hong Kong. London has repeatedly accused China of violating the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the promise of "one country, two systems." The US and other Western countries have also lent their support to London. The recent G7 summit also quoted the Sino-British Joint Declaration and made groundless statements.
What contradicts the Sino-British Joint Declaration is what the UK is doing today. To put it more bluntly, it is the UK, not China, which is really in breach of the 1984 document.
As is known to all, Hong Kong was under British colonization for a long period. Before it returned to China, the two countries signed the Sino-British Joint Declaration which was meant to manage the transition of Hong Kong from British to Chinese rule, not to allow Britain to maintain its influence on Hong Kong after its return to China.
In the joint declaration, China promised "one country, two systems" and a high degree of autonomy for Hong Kong. These commitments were later fully enshrined in the Basic Law. A special committee including many Hongkongers was set up to draft the Basic Law. During the drafting process, views from all sectors of Hong Kong were widely heard.
The legitimacy of Hong Kong's governance today comes from the Basic Law, and the Sino-British Joint Declaration has no role in that. The big logic behind the rule of law in Hong Kong today is to implement the Basic Law. The right to interpret the Basic Law is the exclusive prerogative of the standing committee of the National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China. Britain has no right to say anything about it.
Yet Britain has recently been vocal about Hong Kong's affairs. It has seriously violated the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration on at least two levels. First, it is in serious breach of the original meaning of the Sino-British Joint Declaration and attempts to bring back from history the treaty that has completed the mission of guiding Hong Kong's return to China.
Second, China and the UK had arranged the transition of Hong Kong's return to China through negotiations, with the common purpose of ensuring Hong Kong's prosperity and stability. The so-called "democratic movement" in Hong Kong later, whose radical demands went far beyond the agreement that Britain and China signed as a Joint Declaration on Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy. Hong Kong's last British governor Chris Patten, played an ignominious role, and London indulged him. London continued to support a series of radical moves by the opposition in Hong Kong.
Britain has turned its back on the Sino-British Joint Declaration and made itself a disturbing force for the continued prosperity and stability of Hong Kong after its return to China. However, it is accusing China of undermining the Sino-British Joint Declaration. Today, Hong Kong is much more democratic than the Hong Kong under British rule. Today, the people of Hong Kong are really administering Hong Kong. Every chief executive is a Hong Kong citizen being elected to the position, while all British governors in the colonial era were Britons appointed by London.
How can London have the nerve to teach Beijing how to give Hong Kong citizens more democracy and freedom?